Re: [SQL] MVCC and concurrent clients

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)wallace(dot)ece(dot)rice(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SQL] MVCC and concurrent clients
Date: 1999-08-01 14:55:30
Message-ID: 28386.933519330@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

"Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)wallace(dot)ece(dot)rice(dot)edu> writes:
> How about timestamps?

I thought about that approach originally, but it doesn't change the
nature of the problem. Transactions will not necessarily commit in
the same order as the timestamps they've applied to updated tuples.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Herouth Maoz 1999-08-01 16:57:36 Re: [SQL] date_arithmetic revisited
Previous Message Stéphane FILLON 1999-08-01 07:15:11 CHECK CONSTRAINT