Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
> On 2 May 2023, at 22:39, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> mainly because
>> plperl's spi_exec_prepared uses that name as a caller-exposed hash key.
> But I didn't realize that, and in light of that I agree that limit is better.
OK, let's do it like that then.
>> I'm not especially concerned about the wording otherwise.
> Neither am I, both are fine I think.
I'll compare and merge the two patches and push. Thanks for
looking at it!
regards, tom lane