| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | depesz(at)depesz(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable? |
| Date: | 2012-01-25 15:43:59 |
| Message-ID: | 28307.1327506239@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> writes:
> how can I then have immutable epoch for given point in time?
What do you consider to be "a given point in time"? It seems like
you have not thought through what effects the timezone setting has
on your concept of "now", or at least you have not explained what
you need.
Perhaps even more to the point, why aren't you just storing the
timestamp or timestamptz value and being happy with that?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2012-01-25 15:44:14 | Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable? |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2012-01-25 15:37:44 | Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2012-01-25 15:44:14 | Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable? |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2012-01-25 15:37:44 | Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable? |