Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable?

From: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable?
Date: 2012-01-25 15:37:27
Message-ID: 20120125153727.GA23595@depesz.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:35:47AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> writes:
> > Why aren't the 3rd date_parts the same in both cases? I mean - I see that they
> > are adjusted due to timezone, but why is it happening?
>
> Given a timestamp without time zone, timestamp_part('epoch') assumes
> that it is in session timezone, and rotates it back to UTC so as to
> satisfy the expectation that epoch values start from zero at midnight
> UTC. In short, the calculation you're showing does the zone correction
> an extra time. Don't do that.

ok.
how can I then have immutable epoch for given point in time?

I thought that this is what I will achieve with extract(epoch from now()
at time zone 'UTC') but clearly it doesn't work.
So what options do I have?

Best regards,

depesz

--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2012-01-25 15:37:44 Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-01-25 15:35:47 Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2012-01-25 15:37:44 Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-01-25 15:35:47 Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable?