| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Open 7.4 items |
| Date: | 2003-10-05 06:01:18 |
| Message-ID: | 28254.1065333678@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> writes:
>> Improve speed of building of constraints during restore
> Did we get consensus on what to do with this,
Not really, it was still up in the air I thought. However, the
discussion will become moot if we don't have an implementation
of the faster-checking alternative to look at pretty soon. Do you
have something nearly ready to show?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-05 06:08:31 | Re: COUNT(*) again (was Re: [HACKERS] Index/Function organized table layout) |
| Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2003-10-05 05:50:29 | Re: Open 7.4 items |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-10-05 10:18:02 | Re: pg_id.c windows fix |
| Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2003-10-05 05:50:29 | Re: Open 7.4 items |