From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Open 7.4 items |
Date: | 2003-10-05 13:34:54 |
Message-ID: | 200310051334.h95DYsQ20221@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> writes:
> >> Improve speed of building of constraints during restore
>
> > Did we get consensus on what to do with this,
>
> Not really, it was still up in the air I thought. However, the
> discussion will become moot if we don't have an implementation
> of the faster-checking alternative to look at pretty soon. Do you
> have something nearly ready to show?
Last I remember, there was the idea to make ALTER TABLE use a query to
check all constraints at once, rather than per row, _and_ there was an
idea to turn it off by the superuser. However, if we get the first one,
and it is fast, we might not even use the second one.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-05 13:36:40 | Re: COUNT(*) again (was Re: [HACKERS] Index/Function organized |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-10-05 12:03:27 | Re: Day of week question |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-05 14:30:44 | Re: fix log_min_duration_statement logic error |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-05 13:17:25 | Re: fix log_min_duration_statement logic error |