Re: Queries taking ages in PG 8.1, have been much faster in PG<=8.0

From: "Markus Wollny" <Markus(dot)Wollny(at)computec(dot)de>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Queries taking ages in PG 8.1, have been much faster in PG<=8.0
Date: 2005-12-05 15:45:25
Message-ID: 28011CD60FB1724DBA4442E38277F6264A6C4E@hermes.computec.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] Im Auftrag
> von Markus Wollny
> Gesendet: Montag, 5. Dezember 2005 16:41
> An: Tom Lane
> Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Betreff: Re: [PERFORM] Queries taking ages in PG 8.1, have
> been much faster in PG<=8.0

> an additional 230.328 rows in the answers-table.

That was supposed to read 230,328 rows, sorry.

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Harold 2005-12-05 15:48:24 Re: two disks - best way to use them?
Previous Message Markus Wollny 2005-12-05 15:40:38 Re: Queries taking ages in PG 8.1, have been much faster in PG<=8.0