Re: By now, why PostgreSQL 9.2 don't support SSDs?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, 赖文豫 <xiaolai913(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: By now, why PostgreSQL 9.2 don't support SSDs?
Date: 2013-03-30 16:54:36
Message-ID: 27967.1364662476@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> This isn't the first time I've seen this sort of comment. Do we need to
> add some wording like the above to the top of md.c and the README in
> that directory?

Yeah, probably. I'll go write something ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-03-30 17:01:34 Re: Fix for pg_upgrade and invalid indexes
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-03-30 16:40:38 Re: By now, why PostgreSQL 9.2 don't support SSDs?