Re: Is "trust" really a good default?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is "trust" really a good default?
Date: 2004-07-12 21:27:23
Message-ID: 27912.1089667643@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> writes:
> IMO, forcing su password at initdb time (allowing blank password with a
> very stern warning) and bumping localhost to auth is the right way to
> go.

This isn't happening for a number of reasons, the most obvious being
that we cannot require initdb to be run interactively. (That stern
warning will not impress /dev/null.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-07-12 21:31:38 Re: Problems logging into CVS server
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2004-07-12 21:10:44 Re: Is "trust" really a good default?