| From: | elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Is "trust" really a good default? |
| Date: | 2004-07-13 00:32:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20040712173234.M6381@cookie.varlena.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
It has probably be said before, but new users need
to be able to get up and running on their *development*
system quickly. Throwing new users for a loop with
the password configuration issues would be a problem.
Most people would put up a test server first anyway
in order to check things out and configure as necessary.
--elein
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 05:27:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> writes:
> > IMO, forcing su password at initdb time (allowing blank password with a
> > very stern warning) and bumping localhost to auth is the right way to
> > go.
>
> This isn't happening for a number of reasons, the most obvious being
> that we cannot require initdb to be run interactively. (That stern
> warning will not impress /dev/null.)
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Clift | 2004-07-13 00:53:00 | Re: Problems logging into CVS server |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-07-12 23:43:33 | Re: [subxacts] Open nested xact items |