Re: CLUSTER and indisclustered

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CLUSTER and indisclustered
Date: 2002-08-09 03:52:36
Message-ID: 27798.1028865156@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com> writes:
>> What if I [try to] extend the grammar to support an additional ANALYZE
>> in CLUSTER, so that it analyzes the table automatically?

> I don't like this -- it seems like bloat.

My reaction exactly.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-08-09 03:59:00 Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-09 03:51:51 Re: stand-alone composite types patch (was [HACKERS] Proposal: stand-alone composite types)