| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9) |
| Date: | 2010-03-02 00:15:36 |
| Message-ID: | 27671.1267488936@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
"Ed L." <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net> writes:
> On Monday 01 March 2010 @ 16:57, Tom Lane wrote:>
>> Now that I look more closely at those line numbers, it looks
>> like the thing thinks it is processing an include file. Are
>> there any @ signs in your global/pg_auth file?
> Yes, indeed, there are many. My user names are "user(at)host" form,
> and have been for years. Would that be a problem now?
user(at)host shouldn't be a problem, but if there were an @ by itself or
starting a token, it might possibly cause something like this.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ed L. | 2010-03-02 00:17:06 | Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9) |
| Previous Message | Ed L. | 2010-03-02 00:12:36 | Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ed L. | 2010-03-02 00:17:06 | Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9) |
| Previous Message | Ed L. | 2010-03-02 00:12:36 | Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9) |