Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)

From: "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Date: 2010-03-02 00:17:06
Message-ID: 201003011717.06522.pgsql@bluepolka.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Monday 01 March 2010 @ 17:15, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Ed L." <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net> writes:
> > On Monday 01 March 2010 @ 16:57, Tom Lane wrote:>
> >
> >> Now that I look more closely at those line numbers, it
> >> looks like the thing thinks it is processing an include
> >> file. Are there any @ signs in your global/pg_auth file?
> >
> > Yes, indeed, there are many. My user names are "user(at)host"
> > form, and have been for years. Would that be a problem now?
>
> user(at)host shouldn't be a problem, but if there were an @ by
> itself or starting a token, it might possibly cause something
> like this.

There is one, looks like a typo got in. How do I fix it?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-03-02 00:18:31 Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-03-02 00:15:36 Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-03-02 00:18:31 Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-03-02 00:15:36 Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)