Re:

From: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
To: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re:
Date: 2003-02-10 19:10:00
Message-ID: 273c94088b259c781409e5c1d62c001b@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Wouldn't there need to be an index on OID for your query to be fast?

No, the single index on the "date" field is enough. See the EXPLAIN
output from my first post in the original thread:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-novice/2003-02/msg00075.php

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200302101404
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html

iD8DBQE+R/jEvJuQZxSWSsgRAsaYAKDOzKuujdaqkvImutA0nl1/YqVNvgCg+Qk2
lNTYcT/cGyoFKZzd3bVqef4=
=n1Iq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

  • Re: at 2003-02-08 08:35:39 from Andrew McMillan

Responses

  • Re: at 2003-02-10 19:28:06 from Andrew McMillan

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew McMillan 2003-02-10 19:28:06 Re:
Previous Message Muhammad Shariq Muzaffar 2003-02-10 09:31:54 Transaction automatically rollback but why?