Re:

From: Andrew McMillan <andrew(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re:
Date: 2003-02-08 08:35:39
Message-ID: 1044693339.4874.17.camel@kant.mcmillan.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 04:48, greg(at)turnstep(dot)com wrote:
> > Greg Sabino Mullane (in the other thread) suggested the following alternate,
> > but it ran slightly slower on my machine than the original.
> >
> > SELECT id, date, value FROM sample a WHERE date <='2003-01-01' AND oid =
> > (SELECT oid FROM sample WHERE id = a.id AND DATE <='2003-01-01' ORDER BY
> > date DESC LIMIT 1)
> > ORDER BY id;
>
> You should check this again. There is no way that my query is slower, as
> long as you have an index on the "date" column and have run an ANALYZE on
> the "sample" table.

Wouldn't there need to be an index on OID for your query to be fast?

Cheers,
Andrew.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew @ Catalyst .Net.NZ Ltd, PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington
WEB: http://catalyst.net.nz/ PHYS: Level 2, 150-154 Willis St
DDI: +64(4)916-7201 MOB: +64(21)635-694 OFFICE: +64(4)499-2267
Survey for nothing with http://survey.net.nz/
---------------------------------------------------------------------

In response to

  • Re: at 2003-02-07 15:48:59 from greg

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Muhammad Shariq Muzaffar 2003-02-08 10:20:13 lock timeout in pgsql 7.3.1
Previous Message greg 2003-02-07 19:16:37 Re: Inaccurate results