From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump end comment |
Date: | 2004-03-30 05:29:00 |
Message-ID: | 27371.1080624540@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> This might seem a bit silly, but is there any chance we could add a
> comment at the end of pg_dump text output that says '-- End of dump'?
Sure --- while you're at it, put a "beginning of dump" at the start.
Is it worth adding the database name and/or other command-line
parameters given to pg_dump?
One thing to think about is the difference between a bare pg_dump and a
pg_dump/pg_restore sequence. Should these always generate identical
text output? (They do as of CVS tip, I believe, though this was not
always true before.)
Possibly this is all gilding the lily though...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-30 05:33:37 | Re: pg_dump end comment |
Previous Message | Sean Chittenden | 2004-03-30 04:27:54 | Re: PostgreSQL and FreeBSD SoftUpdates |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-30 05:33:37 | Re: pg_dump end comment |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-03-30 03:37:45 | pg_dump end comment |