| From: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Pedro B(dot)" <pedro(dot)borracha(at)netcabo(dot)pt>, Achilleus Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Datetime |
| Date: | 2004-08-04 01:32:31 |
| Message-ID: | 273266D2-E5B6-11D8-8966-000A95C88220@myrealbox.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Aug 4, 2004, at 7:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Sorry if I added to the confusion instead of dispelling it.
Not at all. I had no idea how timestamps are stored internally, but I
do now. I just knew it wasn't UNIX epoch or the same as the text
representation displayed in results. Your explanation has turned my
negative "what it is not" knowledge into the much more positive "what
it is", and that's always a good thing.
Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ram Nathaniel | 2004-08-05 08:28:44 | SQL syntax extentions - to put postgres ahead in the race |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-03 22:55:08 | Re: Datetime |