Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com> writes:
> I don't quite understand how I am wrong in saying that PostgreSQL does
> not use UNIX epoch timestamps internally, as you've clearly explained
> it doesn't.
We are talking at cross-purposes. I thought you were suggesting that PG
doesn't use a seconds-from-epoch form at all, but some other format
(such as perhaps separate yyyy/mm/dd/hh/mm/ss fields). Sorry if I added
to the confusion instead of dispelling it.
regards, tom lane