Re: pg_upgrade is failed for 'plpgsql_call_handler' handler

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade is failed for 'plpgsql_call_handler' handler
Date: 2021-06-03 14:12:06
Message-ID: 273102.1622729526@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
>> On 3 Jun 2021, at 11:53, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> In one of my testing scenario, i found pg_upgrade is failed for 'plpgsql_call_handler' handle

> This is intentional since the language template work in 8.1, before then
> pg_dump would look up support functions in pg_catalog.

I don't see any particular need to support reaching inside the guts
of another PL language implementation, as this test case does.
We'd be perfectly within our rights to rename plpgsql_call_handler
as something else; that should be nobody's business except that
of the plpgsql extension.

But yeah, the behavior you're seeing here is intended to support
normally-packaged languages. pg_dump won't ordinarily dump objects
in pg_catalog, because it assumes stuff in pg_catalog is to
be treated as built-in.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-06-03 14:20:10 Re: pg_upgrade is failed for 'plpgsql_call_handler' handler
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-06-03 13:45:35 Re: Failures with gcd functions with GCC snapshots GCC and -O3 (?)