Re: Failures with gcd functions with GCC snapshots GCC and -O3 (?)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Failures with gcd functions with GCC snapshots GCC and -O3 (?)
Date: 2021-06-03 13:45:35
Message-ID: 272035.1622727935@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> serinus has been complaining about the new gcd functions in 13~:

moonjelly, which also runs a bleeding-edge gcc, started to fail the same
way at about the same time. Given that none of our code in that area
has changed, it's hard to think it's anything but a broken compiler.
Maybe somebody should report that to gcc upstream?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-06-03 14:12:06 Re: pg_upgrade is failed for 'plpgsql_call_handler' handler
Previous Message Euler Taveira 2021-06-03 13:41:24 missing GRANT on pg_subscription columns