Re: Proposal: psql force prompting on notty

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Mauger <mmaug(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Proposal: psql force prompting on notty
Date: 2003-11-11 04:49:27
Message-ID: 27280.1068526167@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Are there further concerns with this patch?

> No, just getting to it now. Sorry.

Peter didn't agree with this patch, and I have to concur with him
that the need for it is unproven.

Given that it is certainly not going into 7.4 at this late date,
I think Michael will be wanting to look for another solution anyway...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-11 05:15:08 Re: Proposal: psql force prompting on notty
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-11 02:48:06 Re: pgsql CVS build failure on Debian GNU/Linux 3.0