Re: Proposal: psql force prompting on notty

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Mauger <mmaug(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Proposal: psql force prompting on notty
Date: 2003-11-11 05:15:08
Message-ID: 200311110515.hAB5F8Z25514@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> Are there further concerns with this patch?
>
> > No, just getting to it now. Sorry.
>
> Peter didn't agree with this patch, and I have to concur with him
> that the need for it is unproven.
>
> Given that it is certainly not going into 7.4 at this late date,
> I think Michael will be wanting to look for another solution anyway...

Yea, certainly not 7.4. I am not sure he has any other ideas about a
solution, though. I will try to make him a test binary soon and see how
that works --- maybe we can make it an option that only shows up on
Win32.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-11-11 06:19:54 Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-11 04:49:27 Re: Proposal: psql force prompting on notty