Re: Ответ: Ответ: WAL and indexes (Re: [HACKERS] WAL status & todo)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Ответ: Ответ: WAL and indexes (Re: [HACKERS] WAL status & todo)
Date: 2000-10-16 19:19:38
Message-ID: 27212.971723978@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> writes:
> And how could I use such records on recovery
> being unable to know what data columns represent
> keys, what functions should be used for ordering?

Um, that's not built into the index either, is it? OK, you win ...

I'm still nervous about how we're going to test the WAL code adequately
for the lesser-used index types. Any ideas out there?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-16 19:27:38 Re: Re: ?????: ?????: WAL and indexes (Re: [HACKERS] WAL status & todo)
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2000-10-16 19:15:09 Ответ: [HACKERS] Otvet: WAL and indexes (Re: [HACKERS] WAL status & todo)