| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: ?????: ?????: WAL and indexes (Re: [HACKERS] WAL status & todo) |
| Date: | 2000-10-16 19:27:38 |
| Message-ID: | 200010161927.PAA29770@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> writes:
> > And how could I use such records on recovery
> > being unable to know what data columns represent
> > keys, what functions should be used for ordering?
>
> Um, that's not built into the index either, is it? OK, you win ...
>
> I'm still nervous about how we're going to test the WAL code adequately
> for the lesser-used index types. Any ideas out there?
Wait for bug reports? :-)
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-16 19:49:26 | Re: TODO list updates |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-16 19:19:38 | Re: Ответ: Ответ: WAL and indexes (Re: [HACKERS] WAL status & todo) |