| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |
| Date: | 2017-08-11 20:20:51 |
| Message-ID: | 27200.1502482851@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> So, apparently somebody wrote ExecReScanGatherMerge, but never bothered
> to plug it into ExecReScan. From which we may draw depressing conclusions
> about how much it's been tested.
While I'm bitching ... the code coverage report at
https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/executor/nodeGatherMerge.c.gcov.html
also leaves one with less than a warm feeling about the extent of test
coverage on this file. heap_compare_slots isn't invoked even once?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-08-11 20:26:29 | Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-11 15:59:14 | Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-08-11 20:26:29 | Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-08-11 19:50:47 | Re: WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors |