| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <etienne(dot)adam(at)nokia(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Duquesne, Pierre (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <pierre(dot)duquesne(at)nokia(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |
| Date: | 2017-08-11 15:59:14 |
| Message-ID: | 11673.1502467154@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
"Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <etienne(dot)adam(at)nokia(dot)com> writes:
> ERROR: XX000: unrecognized node type: 90
> LOCATION: ExecReScan, execAmi.c:284
(gdb) p (NodeTag) 90
$1 = T_GatherMergeState
So, apparently somebody wrote ExecReScanGatherMerge, but never bothered
to plug it into ExecReScan. From which we may draw depressing conclusions
about how much it's been tested.
Thanks for the report!
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-11 20:20:51 | Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |
| Previous Message | Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux) | 2017-08-11 15:33:22 | [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sokolov Yura | 2017-08-11 16:14:22 | Re: Lazy hash table for XidInMVCCSnapshot (helps Zipfian a bit) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-08-11 15:45:36 | Re: Request more documentation for incompatibility of parallelism and plpgsql exec_run_select |