| From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Zwettler Markus (OIZ)" <Markus(dot)Zwettler(at)zuerich(dot)ch>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: AW: broken backup trail in case of quickly patroni switchback and forth |
| Date: | 2019-11-07 15:25:25 |
| Message-ID: | 26aad343-c08d-d53d-9788-c592450ce438@aklaver.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 11/7/19 7:18 AM, Zwettler Markus (OIZ) wrote:
> I already asked the Patroni folks. They told me this is not related to Patroni but Postgresql. ;-)
Hard to say without more information:
1) Postgres version
2) Setup/config info
3) Detail if what happened between 12:00 and 12:10
>
> - Markus
>
>
>
> On 11/7/19 5:52 AM, Zwettler Markus (OIZ) wrote:
>> we are using Patroni for management of our Postgres standby databases.
>>
>> we take our (wal) backups on the primary side based on intervals and thresholds.
>> our archived wal's are written to a local wal directory first and moved to tape afterwards.
>>
>> we got a case where Patroni switched back and forth sides quickly, e.g.:
>> 12:00h: primary - standby
>> 12:05h: standby - primary
>> 12:10h: primary - standby
>>
>> we realised that we will not have a wal backup of those wal's generated between 12:05h and 12:10h in this scenario.
>>
>> how can we make sure that the whole wal sequence trail will be backuped? any idea?
>
> Probably best to ask the Patroni folks:
>
> https://github.com/zalando/patroni#community
>
>>
>> - Markus
>>
>>
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | stan | 2019-11-07 15:45:58 | 11 -> 12 upgrade on Debian Ubuntu |
| Previous Message | Zwettler Markus (OIZ) | 2019-11-07 15:18:43 | AW: broken backup trail in case of quickly patroni switchback and forth |