AW: broken backup trail in case of quickly patroni switchback and forth

From: "Zwettler Markus (OIZ)" <Markus(dot)Zwettler(at)zuerich(dot)ch>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: AW: broken backup trail in case of quickly patroni switchback and forth
Date: 2019-11-07 15:18:43
Message-ID: 03dc57f7107f432d872bb00ddaa1a093@zuerich.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I already asked the Patroni folks. They told me this is not related to Patroni but Postgresql. ;-)

- Markus

On 11/7/19 5:52 AM, Zwettler Markus (OIZ) wrote:
> we are using Patroni for management of our Postgres standby databases.
>
> we take our (wal) backups on the primary side based on intervals and thresholds.
> our archived wal's are written to a local wal directory first and moved to tape afterwards.
>
> we got a case where Patroni switched back and forth sides quickly, e.g.:
> 12:00h: primary - standby
> 12:05h: standby - primary
> 12:10h: primary - standby
>
> we realised that we will not have a wal backup of those wal's generated between 12:05h and 12:10h in this scenario.
>
> how can we make sure that the whole wal sequence trail will be backuped? any idea?

Probably best to ask the Patroni folks:

https://github.com/zalando/patroni#community

>
> - Markus
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2019-11-07 15:25:25 Re: AW: broken backup trail in case of quickly patroni switchback and forth
Previous Message Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais 2019-11-07 15:18:25 Re: logical replication - negative bitmapset member not allowed