Re: Incorrect CHUNKHDRSZ in nodeAgg.c

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect CHUNKHDRSZ in nodeAgg.c
Date: 2025-02-08 01:15:37
Message-ID: 26873fdfa7ef9ed69d53a49d274f40bb5d1fb1ec.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2025-01-15 at 21:01 +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 at 09:09, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> > Attached v2.
>
> This needs to be rebased due to b4a07f532.

I moved the patch to the other thread here:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/09b325921e50bc3a3217fb01d8eb512c89ee36f1.camel@j-davis.com

because they are all related to reducing the memory usage of HashAgg.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2025-02-08 01:49:57 Re: should we have a fast-path planning for OLTP starjoins?
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2025-02-08 01:13:06 Re: Reduce TupleHashEntryData struct size by half