From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Commit fest? |
Date: | 2008-03-16 16:53:39 |
Message-ID: | 26731.1205686419@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
>> "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>>> The comments are stored at JS-Kit:
>>> http://js-kit.com/comments/
>>
>> It's stored in their server?
> Yes, that was the beauty of it --- I just add javascript with a tag and
> all comments are handled by them.
"Beauty"? I don't think we want to rely on non-project-controlled
servers for anything that's part of our core infrastructure. If/when
js-kit.com goes belly-up, what happens to that data? Also, what kind of
privacy guarantees have we got? (Admittedly, privacy may be moot for
information that was originally entered on a public web page, but the
whole idea of someone else controlling our data just makes me itch.)
I can go along with this as a jury-rig setup for our first commit fest,
but it just seems like another powerful argument for moving to something
wiki-based as soon as we can get that sorted.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-16 17:41:11 | Re: strange cost for correlated subquery |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-03-16 16:42:44 | pgsql: Some cleanups of enum-guc code, per comments from Tom. |