From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Commit fest? |
Date: | 2008-03-17 01:31:38 |
Message-ID: | 200803170131.m2H1VcM06639@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Gregory Stark wrote:
> >> "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> >>> The comments are stored at JS-Kit:
> >>> http://js-kit.com/comments/
> >>
> >> It's stored in their server?
>
> > Yes, that was the beauty of it --- I just add javascript with a tag and
> > all comments are handled by them.
>
> "Beauty"? I don't think we want to rely on non-project-controlled
> servers for anything that's part of our core infrastructure. If/when
> js-kit.com goes belly-up, what happens to that data? Also, what kind of
> privacy guarantees have we got? (Admittedly, privacy may be moot for
> information that was originally entered on a public web page, but the
> whole idea of someone else controlling our data just makes me itch.)
>
> I can go along with this as a jury-rig setup for our first commit fest,
> but it just seems like another powerful argument for moving to something
> wiki-based as soon as we can get that sorted.
We don't need these comments for more than a few weeks --- I don't see a
problem with it.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-03-17 01:31:59 | Re: Commit fest? |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-03-17 00:33:02 | Re: Rewriting Free Space Map |