From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: strncpy is not a safe version of strcpy |
Date: | 2014-08-14 06:50:02 |
Message-ID: | 26688.1407999002@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:21:50AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I believe that we deal with this by the expedient of checking the lengths
>> of tablespace paths in advance, when the tablespace is created.
> The files under scrutiny here are not located in a tablespace. Even if they
> were, isn't the length of $PGDATA/pg_tblspc the important factor?
The length of $PGDATA is of no relevance whatsoever; we chdir into that
directory at startup, and subsequently all paths are implicitly relative
to there. If there is any backend code that's prepending $PGDATA to
something else, it's wrong to start with.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-08-14 06:59:57 | Re: Improvement of versioning on Windows, take two |
Previous Message | MauMau | 2014-08-14 04:52:37 | Re: [patch] pg_copy - a command for reliable WAL archiving |