Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I noticed the following out-of-date bits in a comment in xlogutils.c:
Removing the comment altogether doesn't seem appropriate. I changed it
to
* (Getting the buffer lock is not really necessary during single-process
* crash recovery, but some subroutines such as MarkBufferDirty will complain
* if we don't have the lock. In hot standby mode it's definitely necessary.)
regards, tom lane