Re: Inefficiency in parallel pg_restore with many tables

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inefficiency in parallel pg_restore with many tables
Date: 2023-09-19 01:23:20
Message-ID: 264174.1695086600@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> For now, I've committed 0001 and 0002. I intend to commit the others soon.

bowerbird is unhappy with this. I suppose you missed out updating
the src/tools/msvc/ scripts. (Weren't we about ready to nuke those?)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2023-09-19 01:28:58 Re: Inefficiency in parallel pg_restore with many tables
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-09-19 00:57:44 Re: XLog size reductions: smaller XLRec block header for PG17