Re: Inefficiency in parallel pg_restore with many tables

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inefficiency in parallel pg_restore with many tables
Date: 2023-09-19 01:28:58
Message-ID: 20230919012858.GA2664151@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 09:23:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> For now, I've committed 0001 and 0002. I intend to commit the others soon.
>
> bowerbird is unhappy with this. I suppose you missed out updating
> the src/tools/msvc/ scripts. (Weren't we about ready to nuke those?)

I saw that and have attempted to fix it with 83223f5. I'm still waiting
for an MSVC animal to report back.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-09-19 01:29:03 Re: Improving btree performance through specializing by key shape, take 2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-09-19 01:23:20 Re: Inefficiency in parallel pg_restore with many tables