Re: Backward compatibility

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: John McKown <john(dot)archie(dot)mckown(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Backward compatibility
Date: 2017-07-22 14:49:56
Message-ID: 26391.1500734996@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> But it works incorrectly - it should return:
> 9.5.7 on x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 6.3.1 20161221
> (Red Hat 6.3.1-1), 64-bit
> i.e. without the word "PosgreSQL", since '\s' should match the (first)
> space in the version().

position() is not a regex operation, it's just a plain substring match.

regression=# SELECT position( '\s' in version() ) ;
position
----------
0
(1 row)

You hardly need any flexibility for this anyway, so I'd just do

regression=# SELECT position( ' ' in version() ) ;
position
----------
11
(1 row)

Although possibly what you really want is split_part().

regression=# select split_part(version(), ' ', 2);
split_part
------------
9.5.7
(1 row)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message rob stone 2017-07-22 15:24:00 Re: Backward compatibility
Previous Message Igor Korot 2017-07-22 14:30:38 Re: Backward compatibility