Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Guillaume LELARGE <guillaume(dot)lelarge(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas
Date: 2005-12-12 23:13:29
Message-ID: 2635.1134429209@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Guillaume LELARGE <guillaume(dot)lelarge(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I've made more tests on schemas. I'm able to drop information_schema and
> public schemas but I can't drop pg_catalog and pg_toast. It makes me think
> that only pg_* are system schemas and that public and information_schema are
> public schemas. Am I right on this one ?

Yeah, both of the latter are intentionally droppable because nothing in
the core server depends on them. The C code is explicitly aware of both
pg_catalog and pg_toast, so those are pinned.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-12-12 23:25:24 7.3 failure on platypus
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-12-12 23:07:35 Re: buildfarm off the air pro tem