| From: | Guillaume LELARGE <guillaume(dot)lelarge(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas |
| Date: | 2005-12-12 23:43:08 |
| Message-ID: | 200512130043.08276.guillaume.lelarge@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Le Mardi 13 Décembre 2005 00:13, Tom Lane a écrit :
> Guillaume LELARGE <guillaume(dot)lelarge(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I've made more tests on schemas. I'm able to drop information_schema and
> > public schemas but I can't drop pg_catalog and pg_toast. It makes me
> > think that only pg_* are system schemas and that public and
> > information_schema are public schemas. Am I right on this one ?
>
> Yeah, both of the latter are intentionally droppable because nothing in
> the core server depends on them. The C code is explicitly aware of both
> pg_catalog and pg_toast, so those are pinned.
>
Thanks for your answer.
--
Guillaume.
<!-- http://abs.traduc.org/
http://lfs.traduc.org/
http://traduc.postgresqlfr.org/ -->
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-12 23:44:23 | Re: 7.3 failure on platypus |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-12-12 23:43:04 | Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas |