Re: RHEL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>
Cc: Adam Haberlach <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com>, "Darryl W(dot) DeLao Jr" <ddelao(at)oucpm(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RHEL
Date: 2003-11-13 15:08:10
Message-ID: 26220.1068736090@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu> writes:
> The RHEL3 beta (taroon) had rh-postgresql-server built and included. Does
> RHEL3 not include this package?

I have not actually installed RHEL3 to check, but my understanding is
that it's not there. There was a last-minute decision taken to pull
PG and MySQL from the base distribution with the intent of packaging
them as a separate "layered product". Latest word is that that plan
is off again, leaving us (RH) with no open-source database support
and lots of egg on our faces. So yeah, I'm a bit annoyed. I suppose
some RHEL3 packages will emerge from the mess eventually, but I don't
know exactly how or when.

I think it's important for the powers-that-be to realize that they are
not messing around with unimportant software that no one uses. Thus
my encouragement to people to send in complaints.

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: RHEL at 2003-11-13 04:33:54 from Lamar Owen

Responses

  • Re: RHEL at 2003-11-13 18:47:17 from Bjørn T Johansen

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2003-11-13 16:17:10 Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for a cascaded master-slave replication system
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-11-13 15:06:34 Re: Proposal for a cascaded master-slave replication system