| From: | Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Adam Haberlach <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Darryl W(dot) DeLao Jr" <ddelao(at)oucpm(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: RHEL |
| Date: | 2003-11-13 04:33:54 |
| Message-ID: | 200311122333.54417.lowen@pari.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 11:57 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> Adam Haberlach <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com> writes:
> > I was, a few minutes ago, stunned to discover that as far as I can
> > tell, the postgres server is not part of Red Hat Server ES
> Feel free to let Red Hat know that you're unhappy about this.
> (Not totally unbiased here ... I'm getting *very* tired about RH's
> internal indecision about their extent of commitment to Postgres.
> I think frequent whacks-upside-the-head from paying customers may
> be the only way to get upper management to sit up and take notice.)
The RHEL3 beta (taroon) had rh-postgresql-server built and included. Does
RHEL3 not include this package?
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-13 04:36:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for a cascaded master-slave replication system |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2003-11-13 03:57:28 | Re: plpgsql return setof integer? |