Re: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea
Date: 2001-01-14 16:21:51
Message-ID: 26066.979489311@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Isn't it appropriate to call a diffrent macro using a separate
> CriticalSectionCount variable in newly added places ?

Why? What difference do you see in the nature of the critical sections?
They all look the same to me: hold off cancel/die response.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-01-14 17:03:08 RE: SIGTERM -> elog(FATAL) -> proc_exit() is probably a bad idea
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2001-01-14 15:41:10 R-Tree implementation using GiST