From: | Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "hushthatbush(at)hushmail(dot)com" <hushthatbush(at)hushmail(dot)com>, "pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Is the "x ms" info reliable? |
Date: | 2015-01-17 21:27:07 |
Message-ID: | 259439920.2681241.1421530027819.JavaMail.yahoo@jws10689.mail.bf1.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support |
Have you tried using the "Explain analyze" function (Shift-F7)?
That's what it's for.
Melvin Davidson
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
Folk Alley - All Folk - 24 Hours a day
www.folkalley.com
From: "hushthatbush(at)hushmail(dot)com" <hushthatbush(at)hushmail(dot)com>
To: "pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2015 3:13 PM
Subject: [pgadmin-support] Is the "x ms" info reliable?
In the query window's bottom-right corner, after running a query, it says how long it took. It's ambiguous how exactly this is is calculated. It seems to not take into account the lag from the slow-ass SSH tunnel.
Basically, I wanna know how fast the command *actually* is. Not how long it took to run and then get delivered to pgAdmin via the incredibly sluggish SSH tunnel. The actual, in-app query is run on the same machine, and should be much, much faster.
Is it possible to get this "real time" rather than the "pointless time"?
PS: I hate the command-line psql tool and I don't want anything to do with it.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Hahler | 2015-01-18 15:58:04 | Error when deleting multiple databases: "Maintenance database can't be dropped." |
Previous Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2015-01-17 20:22:16 | Re: Is the "x ms" info reliable? |