Re: pg_amcheck contrib application

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_amcheck contrib application
Date: 2021-03-13 06:07:15
Message-ID: 2589781.1615615635@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
>> ... btw, prairiedog (which has a rather old Perl) has a
>> different complaint:
>> Invalid type 'q' in unpack at t/004_verify_heapam.pl line 104.

> Hmm ... "man perlfunc" on that system quoth
> q A signed quad (64-bit) value.
> Q An unsigned quad value.
> (Quads are available only if your system supports 64-bit
> integer values _and_ if Perl has been compiled to support those.
> Causes a fatal error otherwise.)
> It does not seem unreasonable for us to rely on Perl having that
> in 2021, so I'll see about upgrading this perl installation.

Hm, wait a minute: hoverfly is showing the same failure, even though
it claims to be running a 64-bit Perl. Now I'm confused.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2021-03-13 06:16:55 Re: pg_amcheck contrib application
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2021-03-13 06:01:13 Re: proposal: schema variables