From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tim McAuley <mcauleyt(at)tcd(dot)ie>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
Date: | 2003-09-26 19:05:58 |
Message-ID: | 25892.1064603158@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> Yeah, I was wondering whether you wouldn't propose dropping the newline
>> consistency check. I'm not very comfortable with that, but maybe we
>> should. Bruce?
> I don't mind if we keep it on pure-POSIX platforms. But one of the nicer
> developments on Windows in recent(?) times is that you can actually use
> any kind of line separator and most programs still work correctly (with
> the notable exception of Notepad).
Not sure if we should make the behavior Windows-specific though. And
didn't Michael report seeing the same initdb failure on Debian? That
confuses me a bit --- why would there be a newline discrepancy on Debian?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Holger Marzen | 2003-09-26 19:06:08 | Re: mod_auth_pgsql & encryption |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-26 19:05:47 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-09-26 19:18:37 | Re: initdb failure |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-26 19:05:47 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-09-26 19:18:37 | Re: initdb failure |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-26 19:05:47 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |