Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tim McAuley <mcauleyt(at)tcd(dot)ie>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Date: 2003-09-26 19:59:00
Message-ID: 20030926195900.GA28059@feivel.fam-meskes.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 03:05:58PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Not sure if we should make the behavior Windows-specific though. And
> didn't Michael report seeing the same initdb failure on Debian? That
> confuses me a bit --- why would there be a newline discrepancy on Debian?

I take it there are no special characters in that COPY, right? The only
difference between the two machines we found was that my was running
under UTF-8.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-09-26 20:08:28 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-26 19:57:17 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-09-26 20:08:28 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-26 19:57:17 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-09-26 20:08:28 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-26 19:57:17 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)