| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dim(at)tapoueh(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: mailing list redirect for bug numbers? |
| Date: | 2019-01-18 15:49:25 |
| Message-ID: | 25849.1547826565@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> If we just agree to always use the message-ID of the first message in
> the thread when we're closing out a bug, and people are happy with using
> message-ID, then I'm not really sure what the bug # is doing for us (and
> I see that that question from my prior email wasn't answered).
Yeah, I'm coming to the conclusion that there's nothing worth changing
here. In an ideal world we'd have a bug number for every bug, but we'd
have to give up more than that's worth.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-01-18 16:17:52 | Re: mailing list redirect for bug numbers? |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2019-01-18 15:43:42 | Re: mailing list redirect for bug numbers? |