From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: REFERENCES error message complaint, suggestion |
Date: | 2004-03-04 15:13:33 |
Message-ID: | 25767.1078413213@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Karl O. Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com> writes:
> Does 7.4 do something similar with CHECK constraints?
Nope, just
regression=# create table baz(f1 int check (f1 > 0));
CREATE TABLE
regression=# insert into baz values(-1);
ERROR: new row for relation "baz" violates check constraint "baz_f1"
regression=#
I think this is sufficient though, and that database designers ought to
choose helpful names for constraints. I should have said something like
... constraint "f1 must be positive" check (f1 > 0)
if I were concerned about the error message quality.
I didn't care much for your suggestion of showing the constraint
expression, because to the average non-programmer it would just be
noise.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2004-03-04 15:27:26 | Re: Moving from MySQL to PGSQL....some questions (multilevel |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-03-04 15:09:57 | Re: META: Filtering viruses/worms |