| From: | "Uwe C(dot) Schroeder" <uwe(at)oss4u(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: REFERENCES error message complaint, suggestion |
| Date: | 2004-03-04 21:27:54 |
| Message-ID: | 200403041327.54909.uwe@oss4u.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On the other hand I think this might have some value. There are some DB
maintenance GUIs out there that generate the constraint names on their own,
either giving you a more or less visible way to set constraint names, or just
omitting that possibility at all.
I agree that basically one can ask the database what constraint is which (i.e.
using pgadmin3). On the other hand having a clear error in the logfile might
be convenient.
Just a thought.
UC
On Thursday 04 March 2004 07:13 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Karl O. Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com> writes:
> > Does 7.4 do something similar with CHECK constraints?
>
> Nope, just
>
> regression=# create table baz(f1 int check (f1 > 0));
> CREATE TABLE
> regression=# insert into baz values(-1);
> ERROR: new row for relation "baz" violates check constraint "baz_f1"
> regression=#
>
> I think this is sufficient though, and that database designers ought to
> choose helpful names for constraints. I should have said something like
> ... constraint "f1 must be positive" check (f1 > 0)
> if I were concerned about the error message quality.
>
> I didn't care much for your suggestion of showing the constraint
> expression, because to the average non-programmer it would just be
> noise.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
- --
Open Source Solutions 4U, LLC 2570 Fleetwood Drive
Phone: +1 650 872 2425 San Bruno, CA 94066
Cell: +1 650 302 2405 United States
Fax: +1 650 872 2417
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAR59ajqGXBvRToM4RAosjAKDG7vLq7M6nXzHi3WfximIlJFvVkgCgyAwk
aKUVIxSFjiKIpJ3juIq7WPE=
=Lk8d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Eric Davies | 2004-03-04 21:31:50 | Re: gist index build produces corrupt result on |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-04 21:07:21 | Re: Setting up Postgresql on Linux |