From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 |
Date: | 2008-07-28 18:49:01 |
Message-ID: | 25697.1217270941@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom> That whole business of using the EState to pass tuplestores back
> Tom> and forth looks fundamentally broken to me anyway; there's just
> Tom> no way it'll be certain to link the right nodes together in
> Tom> complicated cases with multiple recursions.
> Mutual recursion is not allowed;
Well, the spec allows it, so we're going to have to fix this kluge
sooner or later, even if it chances not to fail on the subset we
currently support.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2008-07-28 18:57:16 | Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 |
Previous Message | Andrew Garner | 2008-07-28 18:36:13 | Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2008-07-28 18:57:16 | Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 |
Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2008-07-28 17:39:33 | Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 |