From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 |
Date: | 2008-07-30 04:21:39 |
Message-ID: | 20080730042139.GD6750@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 02:49:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> > "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom> That whole business of using the EState to pass tuplestores back
> > Tom> and forth looks fundamentally broken to me anyway; there's just
> > Tom> no way it'll be certain to link the right nodes together in
> > Tom> complicated cases with multiple recursions.
>
> > Mutual recursion is not allowed;
>
> Well, the spec allows it, so we're going to have to fix this kluge
> sooner or later, even if it chances not to fail on the subset we
> currently support.
Any ideas how to approach this?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Lor | 2008-07-30 04:34:54 | Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2008-07-30 02:12:22 | modifying views |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martin Zaun | 2008-07-30 16:51:34 | Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-07-29 14:27:23 | Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode |